Test Results: Crucial Ballistix PC3200

Crucial gets a new lease on life on the DFI nForce4 motherboards with memory performance that blows past our previous results with Ballistix on A64.

Crucial PC3200 Ballistix (DDR400) - 2 x 512Mb Double-Bank
CPU Ratio at 2.4GHz Memory Speed Memory Timings
& Voltage
Quake3
fps
Sandra UNBuffered Sandra Standard Buffered Super PI 2M places
(time in sec)
Wolfenstein - Radar - Enemy Territory
fps
12x200 400DDR 2-2-2-6
3.0V 1T
547.8 INT 2922
FLT 3067
INT 6112
FLT 6060
80 115.2
11x218 436DDR 2-2-2-6
3.1V 1T
550.2 INT 3037
FLT 3210
INT 6538
FLT 6462
80 115.6
10x240 480DDR 2.5-2-2-6
3.2V 1T
562.3 INT 3131
FLT 3333
INT 6792
FLT 6712
79 117.0
9x267 533DDR 2.5-3-3-6
2.8V 1T
559.8 INT 3220
FLT 3473
INT 7043
FLT 6959
79 116.9
10x280
(2.8 GHz)
Highest CPU/Mem Performance 2.5-3-3-6
2.9V 1T
633.7 INT 3532
FLT 3754
INT 7798
FLT 7738
71 133.8

We were able to reach stable memory speeds in the 295 to 300 CPU speed range (DDR590 to DDR600) at slower timings, but the best combination of Memory Speed/CPU Speed/Performance was achieved at 10x280. At 10x280 (2.8GHz) and the still excellent timings of 2.5-3-3-6, Crucial Ballistix turns in performance equivalent to VX at 10x267 2-2-2-6. There is no doubt that the Athlon 64 platform can be a very good match to Crucial Ballistix. When price is considered, Ballistix is still a very attractive choice on the latest nForce4 platforms. It is also interesting that as a memory chip, the Micron chips used in Ballistix are very close in performance to the Winbond chips used in VX at the same timings and speed.

Test Results: Corsair XMS4404v1.1 Test Results: OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev. 2
Comments Locked

53 Comments

View All Comments

  • renzokuken - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link

    Wesley, you've made my day. Thankyou for this follow-up review. The only thing I didn't like is the following statement "The Corsair did not do as well at the highest speeds on the DFI as it has done on other platforms, but that can likely be fixed with a BIOS revision". I'd love to know if/when this BIOS revision will be released and how much it will affect the Corsairs results.

    Btw, if anyone can tell me how to change the password required to post a comment I would be eternally grateful
  • arswihart - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link

    zebo, i have no idea what you tried to just say
  • JoKeRr - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link

    look at corsair and mushkin tccd (3200s) that doesn't use BP pcb, they almost never break 260 either
  • JoKeRr - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link

    but I don't ballsitix uses BP pcb, if it does, it will prob. kill tccd.
  • Zebo - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link

    Consistancy. It's not there. Just browse various forums.. some like us report kick arse performance some can't even get 220Mhz out of it w low timings.

    When you buy TCCD any moron can get at least 275Mhz out of it which is very appealing until you look past sisuck numbers. Also, in general, TCCD is more flexible because of that. Can run 2-2-2 @ 200 just like Ballistix but can also run up around 300Mhz and everything in between. I've never seen ballistix posting at anything above 275 w/1T.
  • Zebo - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link

    "anandtech is the biggest dfi propaganda site on the web"

    They use the best mobo in mem guides this is nothing new where you been? Back in NF3 days it's was MSI NEO2..Back w intel tests it was Asus..actually this is the first time I ever seen them using DFI which stand to raseon since it's the NF4 winnar.
  • ozzimark - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link

    #35-
    one thing i never understood. ballistix (more the micron -5b chips than ballistix itself) has an amazing performance/ocing to cost ratio. plus, it oc's at tight timings fairly well without much voltage. how come it was never very popular like BH-5/UTT and TCCD?
  • Zebo - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link

    Joker, Ballistix is essentially EB..so it likes up to 3.1 too but runs hot...need to cool it activly and have a mobo which staggers mem like DFI's.. i.e geographically in slots: Mem--Blank--Mem--Blank to allow air flow.

    I personally run 245Mhz 2.5-2-2 1T @ 2.8

    But screwing around w/ volts I get 261 2.5-2-2 w/o error But since I'm a silence freak it's not for me.

    Still this winbond UTT mem is better overall if you plan to send high volts to mem anywayz
  • Zebo - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link

    "TCCD isn't the holy grail of RAM anymore."

    It never was. It's loose arse timings always got whooped by Ballistix, and especially "old" BH-5 in the benchmarks running async with tight timings and moderate BW. This new ram is from co that brought you BH-5 and it's prolly better except it can't run 1.5 CAS.
  • arswihart - Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - link

    anandtech decides to focus on dfi and ocz as a magical combination, no matter what qualifications they make in the article they are still selling these specific products to readers. Its reflected in the forums and probably in sales. I don't like how anandtech's articles are beginning to constantly offer suggestions and declarations about the best this and that (often just based on what they have reviewed to date, not all that is available).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now